Glossary
One-way video interview
A one-way video interview is a recorded interview where candidates read or hear preset questions and record their answers on their own time, with no interviewer present.
One-way video interviews, sometimes called video screening or on-demand interviews, became common because they remove scheduling. The candidate opens a link, sees a question, gets some thinking time, and records an answer. The hiring team watches the recordings later.
How it usually works
- A question appears as text or a short pre-recorded clip.
- The candidate gets preparation time, often 30 seconds to a couple of minutes.
- They record an answer within a time limit, commonly one to three minutes.
- Some tools allow retakes, others don’t.
- Reviewers watch each video and rate it, sometimes with a scorecard.
Where it helps
Every candidate gets the same questions, which makes answers easier to compare. Candidates can take it at 7am before a shift or late at night after putting kids to bed. And it moves the first round off the recruiter’s calendar.
Where it struggles
No follow-ups. If a candidate says “I improved our onboarding,” nobody asks how, by how much, or what their part was. Vague answers stay vague.
Talking to a camera is odd. Many capable people freeze without a face to respond to, and the format rewards people who are comfortable on video, which isn’t the job for most roles.
Someone still has to watch. Assume 50 candidates, five questions each and about 90 seconds per answer. That’s over six hours of footage, before anyone writes a note.
Running one well
- Keep it to three to five questions, and tell candidates the total time up front.
- Allow at least one retake. A cough shouldn’t sink an application.
- Write a rubric before you watch the first video, and rate on what was said, not the lighting or background.
- Offer an audio or text alternative where you can, for candidates without a good camera or a private room.
How it compares
A conversational AI interview keeps the async timing but adds follow-up questions and a written, scored summary, so reviewers read the evidence instead of watching every minute. The comparison guide sets the two side by side.